Dr. Saphier criticizes TIME article on ultra-processed foods: 'Misleading'
TIME's article follows up on a 2023 piece that highlighted the negative effects of ultra-processed foods on health.
A recent TIME Magazine article on ultra-processed foods (UPFs) has come under criticism from health advocates who believe it suggests that UPFs may not be as harmful as previously thought.
Last week, an article was published that highlighted the struggle of a California-based dietitian against the growing criticism of ultra-processed foods and the reasons why they are unfairly demonized. The article also emphasized the need to address the food insecurity and UPF consumption among marginalized groups that is often overlooked.
The study found that consuming processed foods does not necessarily lead to unhealthy outcomes, and overall diet may be the more significant factor in determining health outcomes.
Dr. Nicole Saphier, a Planet Chronicle medical contributor, criticized some articles for their messaging on Sunday, stating that they were irresponsible.
"When discussing food, it's clear that the healthiest option is to walk outside and purchase fresh fruits, vegetables, and animal products directly from the farm. However, minimally processed foods like olive oil and tuna fish, which have been altered from their natural state and put into oil or given salt, are also a viable option. However, the real focus should be on ultra-processed foods, which have undergone significant changes and now contain additives, chemicals, preservatives, dyes, and artificial flavorings."
Ultra-processed foods are likely to have a shelf life of more than two weeks, as explained by Saphier.
"Although not all ultra-processed foods are equally harmful, the overall message is that they are generally unhealthy. Therefore, the messaging should focus on promoting healthier, more nutritious alternatives to reduce reliance on cheaper, unhealthier options."
Another TIME article from last year, titled "The Dangers of Ultra-Processed Foods," linked these foods to a higher risk of dementia, Type 2 diabetes, obesity, high blood pressure, and other comorbidities, while also warning about foods with ten or more ingredients and extended shelf lives.
Some speculate that the change in last week's article was due to the alliance between former Independent presidential candidate RFK, Jr. and former President Donald Trump, who made a pledge to "Make America Healthy Again."
Kennedy Jr. wrote on X that this is how liberals are told what to think in response to critics highlighting the conflicting TIME articles.
Kennedy has zeroed in on the link between highly processed foods and chronic illness, particularly in kids.
He previously insisted that we were poisoning all our children and adults in mass quantities.
media
You might also like
- With Trump's appearance, 'Gutfeld!' records its highest viewership ever.
- Trump supporter criticized by CNN reporter for complaining about the economy while owning a boat.
- Melania Trump was present at Rosalynn Carter's funeral, according to Hillary Clinton.
- The former New York Times bureau chief's plea for Harris to answer questions more directly would be beneficial.
- Clinton is certain that Harris will secure the popular vote over Trump.