CNN criticized for stating that Harris provided the "clearest view yet" of her potential presidency in an interview: "Is that so?"

CNN faced criticism from social media users for stating that Vice President Kamala Harris provided the "most comprehensive insight into her potential presidency" during her interview with the network.

After Vice President Biden's interview with Dana Bash on Thursday evening, Harris and CNN faced criticism from their critics, who claimed that the interview lacked substance on policy and was filled with "incomprehensible drivel."

Did you watch it, Matt Whitlock, the GOP communications person, asked on X?

On Thursday evening, CNN's X account published a questionable claim stating that Kamala Harris gave the clearest view yet of her plans for her presidency in an exclusive CNN interview.

In less than 24 hours, the post received nearly two million views and garnered thousands of comments, including from notable media figures who argued that the interview did not accurately represent Harris' policy plans.

According to conservative commentator Tim Young, the network was criticized for not having watched the interview.

Charles Cooke, a senior writer at National Review, refuted the post, asserting that she never did what was claimed and no one asked her to do it.

Abigail Shrier, a journalist and Manhattan Institute senior fellow, pointed out that commentators who say Harris "did fine" are missing the point. Shrier noted that Harris spent hours with enthusiastically-supportive media, and CNN only cherrypicked 18 minutes of the interview because the rest was presumably incomprehensible drivel.

"Shrier remarked that Kamala Harris might be the most hollow of all hollow suits," he said.

Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist criticized CNN's post, saying, "This is propaganda that would make the North Koreans blush."

The Redheaded Libertarian" disagreed with CNN's evaluation of Harris' performance. She quoted the Adam Sandler movie "Billy Madison," stating, "Her response was a jumbled mess with no logical coherence. Listening to her has made everyone in the room less intelligent.

Stephen L. Miller, a contributing editor to The Spectator, responded to the post with the question, "Did she?"