The GOP AG predicts which side has an advantage in the historic SCOTUS transgender case with 'divided' justices.

The Supreme Court justices debated a groundbreaking case concerning transgender medical care for kids during oral arguments.

The Tennessee Attorney General, who is the main figure in the lawsuit against the Biden administration, stated to Planet Chronicle Digital that the justices will be deeply considering the case in the upcoming months.

He stated that he never imagined being involved in such a high-profile legal case.

"Skrmetti stated in a phone interview that he believes the significant disagreement supports their position, and the court should not intervene in this area as the data is still in its early stages."

"Skrmetti stated that the research cited by both sides is inconclusive. This field of science remains uncertain, and in such cases, the best approach is through the democratic process. Our legislators allocate resources to address this uncertainty and make decisions for each individual state."

On Wednesday, the justices appeared divided after oral arguments, and the three appointed by former President Trump could be the key to deciding the socially divisive question. Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett asked tough questions of both sides, while Justice Neil Gorsuch did not speak during the marathon public session.

The Supreme Court is examining whether the Equal Protection Clause prohibits states from restricting medical providers from administering puberty blockers and hormones to minors who want to transition to a different gender, as per the case of U.S. v. Skrmetti.

In the court, hundreds of protesters gathered for and against gender transition treatments for children. Chloe Cole, a detransitioner and activist, spoke to Planet Chronicle Digital and stated that if the justices rule against the ban on trans medical treatments, it will make it harder to protect children and young people on legislative fronts.

To establish a precedent for other states to follow and uphold this law in courts, we must act now, as stated by Cole.

At 16, Cole detransitioned and told Planet Chronicle Digital that doctors had done an "incredible disservice" to her by helping her transition at a young age.

"Cole stated, "These doctors, who knew better, have done an incredible disservice to me by not allowing me to nurse my children with what God gave me. They knew better than to do this to a child, but they still chose to do it. However, they messed with the wrong kid, and I will make sure that no other child in America is ever abused in the same way I was.""

The court's decision on transgender issues, such as access to bathrooms and school sports participation, could have far-reaching consequences and is expected by July 2025.

If the court favors state governments over itself on these issues, it could lead to an inhibited debate, as seen in other contexts where judges overstep their bounds and subvert democracy, ultimately harming the country, according to Skrmetti.

"It undermines the legitimacy of the government and makes people feel disconnected from the political process. Instead of closing the door, we should keep it open to our democratic system of resolving conflicts, allowing for debate and different perspectives. Over time, this will lead to better research and a more informed decision, ultimately resulting in a better resolution on this contentious issue where the Constitution is silent."

The Justices' ruling may impact broader discussions on whether sexual orientation and gender identity should be considered protected classes under civil rights legislation, similar to the safeguards afforded to race and national origin.

Skrmetti stated that it is ultimately up to the court to decide whether the incoming Trump administration can persuade them to handle the case in a certain way. Trump campaigned on a promise to outlaw transgender medical procedures for minors and open the door to lawsuits against medical providers who conduct them.

He stated that although there is a path for them to proceed, it is crucial to obtain clarity promptly because numerous cases involve these issues, and lower courts are seeking guidance. A clearer answer to the state of the law would benefit everyone.

Planet Chronicle Digital's Shannon Bream and Bill Mears contributed to this report.